Train Song
I'm sorry, but this is not
Your "father's magic carpet made of steel."
The modern coaches bump and sway
And rattle over renewed railwork
Pulled by diesel electrics of
Brutal power
But in this insular world
That sometimes glides
Sometimes lurches
I think of
Track laid by hand for thousands of miles
Tunnels dug by pick and blasted by black powder
Work done by dispossessed Irish and Chinese
The long train shakes and rattles
And yet
It works, as imperfect and as glorious
As we.
--Dan Verner
Friday, August 31, 2012
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Advice for Writers--Walking in Rhythm
Well, truth be told, this is not so much about walking in rhythm (which was a wonderful song by Howard University's Donald Byrd and the Blackbyrds a while back--check it out at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vxg-a8a2UuY) as it is about paying attention to rhythm in writing.
Now, I'm not talking about the rhythm of a sentence or the rhythm of speech reproduced in prose or even about rhythm in poetry. Those are important because without rhythm in our speech we would sound like one of those robots or androids in a sci-fi movie. In a related matter (I'm digressing--shocker!), don't you just hate it when you make a call to some business and you get one of those voice recognition programs that can't recognize its own mother? I want to say, "No, I won't say 'one' to speak to a person. Let me press 'one' please for the love of mercy." To which the robo-speaker replies, "I could not understand your comment. Please repeat. To speak to a person, say 'One...'"
Or worse, when you're trying to get the thing to understand where you want to fly.
Robovoice: "Please speak the name of your destination."
You: "I want to go to Washington, D.C."
Robovoice: "You want to go to Washington State. Is that correct?"
You: "No, I want to go to Washington, the District of Columbia."
Robovoice: "You want to go to Colombia. Is that correct?"
You: "No, I want to go to the CITY of Washington, D.C."
Robovoice: "You want to go to Cincinnatti, Ohio. Is that correct?"
You: "No, I want to go to Dulles Airport near Washington, D.C.!"
Robovoice: "You want to go to Duluth, Minnesota. Is that correct?"
You: "No! Is there a person I can talk to, please?"
Robovoice: "You want to go to Paris, France. Is that correct?"
I think you get the idea.
Anyhow, this post is about the larger rhythms of prose writing, specifically, the rhythm of using description in which you as a writer (hang on here) describe things for a while and let the pace of the story marinate in its own goodness for a while, and in using exposition in which things happen and the story moves ahead. I suppose it would be possible to use all description in a story but not much would happen. We would have some nice description a flora and fauna or people in a city, have no idea as to what was going on. We as humans want to know what's going on.
Conversely, if we had only exposition, we would know something was happening but we wouldn't know where or when or why or wherefore it was.
Here's the point: we need both in some sort of larger rhythm to keep people reading and to help them understand in an immediate and, in a larger sense, in the immortal words of Marvin Gaye, "What's Going On." (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzPA-FrVu3I) When to use each is a matter of judgment. So break out some rhythm in your story. You will happier and your readers will, too.
Now, I'm not talking about the rhythm of a sentence or the rhythm of speech reproduced in prose or even about rhythm in poetry. Those are important because without rhythm in our speech we would sound like one of those robots or androids in a sci-fi movie. In a related matter (I'm digressing--shocker!), don't you just hate it when you make a call to some business and you get one of those voice recognition programs that can't recognize its own mother? I want to say, "No, I won't say 'one' to speak to a person. Let me press 'one' please for the love of mercy." To which the robo-speaker replies, "I could not understand your comment. Please repeat. To speak to a person, say 'One...'"
Or worse, when you're trying to get the thing to understand where you want to fly.
Robovoice: "Please speak the name of your destination."
You: "I want to go to Washington, D.C."
Robovoice: "You want to go to Washington State. Is that correct?"
You: "No, I want to go to Washington, the District of Columbia."
Robovoice: "You want to go to Colombia. Is that correct?"
You: "No, I want to go to the CITY of Washington, D.C."
Robovoice: "You want to go to Cincinnatti, Ohio. Is that correct?"
You: "No, I want to go to Dulles Airport near Washington, D.C.!"
Robovoice: "You want to go to Duluth, Minnesota. Is that correct?"
You: "No! Is there a person I can talk to, please?"
Robovoice: "You want to go to Paris, France. Is that correct?"
I think you get the idea.
Anyhow, this post is about the larger rhythms of prose writing, specifically, the rhythm of using description in which you as a writer (hang on here) describe things for a while and let the pace of the story marinate in its own goodness for a while, and in using exposition in which things happen and the story moves ahead. I suppose it would be possible to use all description in a story but not much would happen. We would have some nice description a flora and fauna or people in a city, have no idea as to what was going on. We as humans want to know what's going on.
Conversely, if we had only exposition, we would know something was happening but we wouldn't know where or when or why or wherefore it was.
Here's the point: we need both in some sort of larger rhythm to keep people reading and to help them understand in an immediate and, in a larger sense, in the immortal words of Marvin Gaye, "What's Going On." (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzPA-FrVu3I) When to use each is a matter of judgment. So break out some rhythm in your story. You will happier and your readers will, too.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Technology Wednesday: Trains and Planes and Automobiles
Maybe it's having spent about three days aboard a train recently, but I have been thinking a lot about trains and especially about older and newer forms of technology. Passenger trains have been around for about 200 years, and passenger airplanes for, let's say, about 90 or so.
While aboard the train, I heard a number of riders talking about trains as a superior means of transportation. The atmosphere is more relaxed, you can walk around, you can look at the scenery, etc. Of course, if you don't want to take two days to get to the West Coast from Chicago, you can take a plane. I thought of these people as being like those who favor paper books over e-readers, and really, there are advantages to both forms, just as there are advantages to trains and to airplanes.
When home computers were first introduced, people tried to use them to store recipes, which could then be brought up on the computer to fix a dish. The idea didn't catch on for obvious reasons. I wouldn't want Hollandaise sauce all over my Toshiba laptop, like many other people. So, computers: good for word processing; not better than the recipe box for storing recipes.
We experienced a similar advantage to older technology this past month. We flew down to Durham N.C. to visit some friends. Door to door, it took five and a half hours. About ten days later, tragically, the lady died, and we needed to return so Becky could play for her funeral. I calculated that it would be faster to drive, as it is with distances of less than 300 miles or so. It took us four hours and twenty minutes to do so. Advantage: driving.
So, it's not the newness or sophistication of the technology that counts: it's the suitability of the technology for the task at hand. And that is a matter for human judgment.
While aboard the train, I heard a number of riders talking about trains as a superior means of transportation. The atmosphere is more relaxed, you can walk around, you can look at the scenery, etc. Of course, if you don't want to take two days to get to the West Coast from Chicago, you can take a plane. I thought of these people as being like those who favor paper books over e-readers, and really, there are advantages to both forms, just as there are advantages to trains and to airplanes.
When home computers were first introduced, people tried to use them to store recipes, which could then be brought up on the computer to fix a dish. The idea didn't catch on for obvious reasons. I wouldn't want Hollandaise sauce all over my Toshiba laptop, like many other people. So, computers: good for word processing; not better than the recipe box for storing recipes.
We experienced a similar advantage to older technology this past month. We flew down to Durham N.C. to visit some friends. Door to door, it took five and a half hours. About ten days later, tragically, the lady died, and we needed to return so Becky could play for her funeral. I calculated that it would be faster to drive, as it is with distances of less than 300 miles or so. It took us four hours and twenty minutes to do so. Advantage: driving.
So, it's not the newness or sophistication of the technology that counts: it's the suitability of the technology for the task at hand. And that is a matter for human judgment.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Cross Country by Rail
Day
1: August 24, 2012
3:45 PM: We boarded the train (on time at 11:57 AM) in
Manassas. The crew was very friendly and helpful Our roomette sleeper was very compact. Dad and
I are sitting knee to knee with our luggage piled around us. Note to self—just
bring one not too big suitcase if I
do this again.
Got to Charlottesville in just under two hours. The
scenery is beautiful and different from what one sees from the road.
Lunch was good and we had a nice conversation with a
lady and her high school sophomore son who were on their way to the Greenbrier.
They had been in DC for a week and would go home to Cincinnatti after their
stay at the Greenbrier.
We have amused ourselves by reading, napping and
looking out the window. We’re somewhere west of Staunton, running about 20
minutes behind. Next stop isCLifton Forge in about half an hour.
4:30 PM
Stopped at Clifton Forge, last stop in Virginia.
I’ve moved to the club car where there’s a table I can type (keyboard) on and
have a little more leg room. Then sun’s out. There was an old steam loco in a
beautiful green livery marked “The Homestead,” which is near here. I looked
into thje coach car which seems to have more legroom than we have. I wouldn’t
want to sleep there for three nights, though, so our little roomette will do
fine when it comes to sleeping. And I can use the club car to work in and look
at the scenery.
6:50 PM
Just leaving Beckley WV. Had a nice dinner with a
lady whom we know by means of her sister, who died a few years ago. She is on
her way to Montana. We also got to know a young woman who is going to work at a
hotel in Death Valley and who will be working on a book, free from
distractions. We talked writing for a while and now we’re back in our
sleeperette reading, looking at the scenery (most notably the Greenbrier River,
which runs beside the tracks) and thinking about bed in about three hours.
Day
2: August 25, 2012
6:00 AM
We’re in Indianapolis, where there is a scheduled
layover of about an hour. Sleeping on the train was not too bad—the berth was
comfortable and I was able to read for a while. The train would inexplicably
stop during the night in the middle of nowhere. I guess they have their ways.
We get to Chicago about 10, where we have a four-hour layover.
2:35 PM
We’re on the California Zephyr, waiting our turn on
some single-tracking road work south of Chicago. We got into Chicago and 10:15
this morning, and I was pleasantly surprised to find out we were eligible to
wait the four hours for our train in the First Class (Sleeping Car) Lounge.
There were free drinks (non-alcoholic) and snacks and we talked to some
interesting and nice people
.
.
We boarded at 1:15 and are settled in compartment 3
of the last of three sleeping cars. The Amtrak employees have been to a person
helpful, good-natured and well-informed. When I asked our car attendant this
morning why the train stopped for periods of time, she replied that mostly it
was to let freight trains pass (they pay the freight, ha ha) and in one case it
was so an obstreperous passenger could be taken off by police. I suppose that
counts as drama on the rails.
I would also advise any two people sharing a
roomette on a trip like this to pack one large suitcase which can be stored and
a carry-on that contains essentials that you need for each day. Also, don’t
count on wi fi. I’m getting some things out on my iPhone, for which reception
has been fairly consistent. Another
thing I would do is bring snacks. The sleeping car has a stock of water, coffee
and juices, but unless you want to pay an expectedly high price for Nabs, bring
your own.
7:15 PM
We crossed into Iowa about 5:30, and I can report
that it too is flat and covered with crops. Much of the corn looks like it has
been burned up by the drought. It’s a sad sight—acre after acre and mile after
mile of brown corn stalks. I suppose all that it’s good for is sileage, and
that’s not worth very much from what I hear.
We move into Nebraska about 11 tonight and traverse
the state in the dark. With the light will come Colorado and what I hear are some
truly spectacular views and vistas. I’m looking forward to it.
Day
3: August 26, 2012
7 AM
We’re about 40 minutes outside Denver and the land
is still flat. I thought we’d be among the mountains, but that shows how much I
know about geography.
If you take one of these trains, bring your
appetite. Every meal is about twice as much as I can eat. Too bad there aren’t
refrigerators in the rooms, If there were, we’d end up sitting on them because
everything is crammed in. It makes me think of the Apollo spacecraft (and by
the way, Neil Armstrong passed away yesterday. He was indeed a brave and
resourceful pioneer who always acknowledged the thousands of people who put him
on the moon.)
More later as we get into the mountains. Singin’
“Rocky Mountain High!”
8:45 AM
We’re moving through the western suburbs of Denver,
and I see mountains! At least, I think they’re mountains. Maybe they’re just
foothills since they don’t look high enough to be mountains. Yes, I know I am
an amazing geologist. Not.
Neither am I a botanist. The vegetation looks subtly
different here, although I can’t say what the difference is. I suppose that
climate and altitude make a difference. Wow. I should be a horticulturist as
well.
More later as we get into the mountains…if these are
foothills now…
10:45 AM
We’re on the western slopes of the Rockies, and the
passage through the mountains was magnificent! Seeing them in a video or
picture or reading a description doesn’t begin to do justice to the beauty and
grandeur of these slopes. We’re going to be going through the western slopes
for about three more hours so there should be plenty of beautiful scenery
ahead.
2:30 PM
We went through the Gore Gorges which were formed by
the Colorado River. I am struck by the size of geological formations here,
having never seen these in the West. The Colorado in this section has a number
of fisherpeople and rafters, some of whom have a tradition of mooning the train
as it goes by. The train crew calls the Colorado “Moon River,” in fact!
We cross into Utah about 7:30 this evening, which I
understand is mostly desert. Until then it’s Colorado, Colorado, Colorado all
the way!
The mountains and foothills of the Rockies shifted
to huge outcroppings of folded rock. I would call them mesas but they didn’t
have flat tops. Then, somewhere around 5 PM, the landscape changed to a desert with huge piles of what looked
like either sand or gravel. And apparently we crossed into Utah, with notice,
without a sound. And so, Utah this evening, Nevada early tomorrow morning and California
in mid-morning. We are “winning near the goal” as Keats said about something
else entirely.
Day
4 August 27, 2012
6:00 AM
One advantage to staying on Eastern time is that
you’re up before anyone else. We were up at 4:30 local time. Alyssa said that
when she travels she stays on Eastern time.
We’re about two and a half hours out of Reno. I have
to confess that I hit a kind of wall last night. I felt like I had been on a
train forever and would never be able to get off. I was tired of looking at desert,
too. I was unfocused to write and wanted some room to spread out in. It just shows how
hard it is for me (us) to relax. I’m anticipating getting off the train about
5, getting to Oakland Airport, boarding a plane about 11 and being home about 7
AM (Eastern Time). I feel better after a night’s sleep. Shakespeare was right:
“Sleep, that knits up the raveled sleeve of care…” Rock on, Will S.!
10:00 AM
After a stop in Reno (the conductor advised
passengers not to get off and hit the slots at the station. People have been
left doing so, apparently), we came into California and the little town of
Truckee.
We are in the Sierras now and we’re entering some
spectacular scenery. I’ll take a break and take some pictures and then come
back and talk about the people we’ve met on the train.
I think I wrote about the wonderful quality of the
meals. I’ve also enjoyed talking to people we’ve shared a table with. With one
exception, people were open and friendly, and talked openly of their travels
and experiences. We talked with people from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New
Hampshire, North Dakota, Chicago and other stations on our route, as well as
Scotland and England.. I talked with railroad employees, teachers, writers, and government workers.
I have to also say something about the friendliness
and competence of every Amtrak employee we came across. We had most contact
with our sleeping car attendant, Stephanie, who was friendly, energetic,
helpful and knowledgeable. She kept a special eye out for my dad when he
couldn’t find his way back to our room a couple of times and brought my dad
some meals when he found it difficult to walk the length of three cars to the
dining car. When the toilets failed on our sleeping car (there were plenty on
the other sleeping cars), she took it personally, apologizing profusely and
telling us how to contact Amtrak for a refund or ticket credit. The air
conditioning kept popping a breaker, and she would reset it about every twenty
minutes. I have never met such a dedicated, personable hard-working young
woman. Amtrak should be very proud of her!
2:30 PM
Let’s see…we ate our last meal aboard the train and
came through Sacramento. We’re running about 15 minutes ahead of schedule and
should be in Emeryville early. From there we transfer to another train for
Oakland, catch a cab for the airport and an 11 PM flight to Dulles, arriving at
6:50 AM local time.
I’ll have some reflections on the trip Tuesday after
I get home, unpack and take a nap. First things first.
Day 5 August 28,, 2012
9:00 AM
Our overnight flight from Oakland was early, so here I am at home and happy to be here. I couldn't help contrasting the tension and pressure of air travel with the relaxed nature of life aboard a long-distance train. I'm glad we went, but I wouldn't want to do it again any time soon. Now for a nice nap to catch up on lost sleep!
Monday, August 27, 2012
Riding on the California Zephyr
Well, here we are on Amtrak, after having ridden through some of the most spectacular scenery I have ever seen between Denver and Provo, Utah. I've read about these vistas, seen pictures of them and seen them in movies and videos. But nothing--nothing matches the pure beauty and grandeur of these magnificent landscapes .
My dad and I had both wanted to make this trip, so we are. We won't be home until Tuesday morning, so I'll post this from the train Monday morning and have a longer post Tiesday.
Stay tuned!
My dad and I had both wanted to make this trip, so we are. We won't be home until Tuesday morning, so I'll post this from the train Monday morning and have a longer post Tiesday.
Stay tuned!
Friday, August 24, 2012
A Special Announcement and The Continuing No Shame Poetry Series Presents "Driving to a Funeral"
Special announcement:
Today about noon my 87-year-old father and I will board a train in Manassas (where we live) for a father-son trip to the West Coast. We will go through Chicago, Omaha, Denver, Salt Lake City, Reno and into California, where we will end up in Oakland late Monday afternoon. From there, we will go to Oakland Airport and board a Jet Blue red-eye which will get us back to Dulles about 7 AM next Tuesday.
I will try to do posts each day on the journey. I understand that wi fi is spotty on long-distance Amtrak trains, so it that doesn't work I will try posting something every day via my i-Phone with a complete report next week.
If I'm able to post and you're able to follow our travels, I hope you will enjoy the account!
And now for our poem of the week, occasioned by driving to a funeral a week ago, and driving to other funerals other places, other times.
Driving to a Funeral
There is something elemental
About driving to a funeral.
It is different from other drives,
A journey undertaken for a journey,
A destination for a destination.
We travel without saying much
And what little conversation there is
Moves back to the matter at hand:
"He was a fine fellow"
Or
"She was a gracious lady."
The miles slide by
And we remember.
We are driving, traveling,
Each of us,
On that journey
To a shared destination.
--Dan Verner
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Advice for Writers--Inch by Inch, Row by Row
Some of you fellow folkies out there will recognize this line as part of a John Denver song entitled "Garden Song" which is, not surprisingly, about a garden. Here's part of it:
Inch by inch, row by row
Gonna make this garden grow
All it takes is a rake and a hoe
And a piece of fertile ground
Inch by inch, row by row
Someone bless these seeds I sow
Someone warm them from below
'Til the rain comes tumbling down
There! Doesn't that make you feel all mellow and good and like you want to haul out the six-strings and twelve-strings and banjos and mandolins and washtub basses and harmonicas and fiddles and mandolins and any other instrument you can think of and sing chorus after chorus until the sun is coming up? I know that's what it does for me, and I even had a job once.
The principle of growing a garden applies to a number of processes. I think it's called accretion. If you add a little something to a little something else, pretty soon you have something bigger (I am so smart). Think stalagmites in Luray Caverns--a little drip of mineral-laden water, a few tens of thousands of years and voila! a stalagmite of your very own to be keep and be proud of.
I think this applies to writers in that if you write a little bit (or even a lot) each day, after a while you'll have more. It's just a matter of doing it--well, doing it and making sure it's good and revising it again and again. Sounds pretty simple, even though it does take a fair amount of discipline and know-how.
I write about 1000 words each weekday on my novel, and now, after about two and a half months, I have 50,000 words, enough that I have to keep a note card on each character at this point so they're not wearing a green dress at the beginning of a chapter and a yellow one at the end (this actually happened). In about another two and a half months, I should have a novel, which, when gone over about fifty times, should be ready to show to some people (if they're not entirely tired of hearing about it). I don't write quickly, but I like to think I write good. And as I do, I find my self singing with each word I add to the pile,
Inch by inch, row by row
Gonna make this garden grow
All it takes is a rake and a hoe
And a piece of fertile ground
Inch by inch, row by row
Gonna make this garden grow
All it takes is a rake and a hoe
And a piece of fertile ground
Inch by inch, row by row
Someone bless these seeds I sow
Someone warm them from below
'Til the rain comes tumbling down
There! Doesn't that make you feel all mellow and good and like you want to haul out the six-strings and twelve-strings and banjos and mandolins and washtub basses and harmonicas and fiddles and mandolins and any other instrument you can think of and sing chorus after chorus until the sun is coming up? I know that's what it does for me, and I even had a job once.
The principle of growing a garden applies to a number of processes. I think it's called accretion. If you add a little something to a little something else, pretty soon you have something bigger (I am so smart). Think stalagmites in Luray Caverns--a little drip of mineral-laden water, a few tens of thousands of years and voila! a stalagmite of your very own to be keep and be proud of.
I think this applies to writers in that if you write a little bit (or even a lot) each day, after a while you'll have more. It's just a matter of doing it--well, doing it and making sure it's good and revising it again and again. Sounds pretty simple, even though it does take a fair amount of discipline and know-how.
I write about 1000 words each weekday on my novel, and now, after about two and a half months, I have 50,000 words, enough that I have to keep a note card on each character at this point so they're not wearing a green dress at the beginning of a chapter and a yellow one at the end (this actually happened). In about another two and a half months, I should have a novel, which, when gone over about fifty times, should be ready to show to some people (if they're not entirely tired of hearing about it). I don't write quickly, but I like to think I write good. And as I do, I find my self singing with each word I add to the pile,
Inch by inch, row by row
Gonna make this garden grow
All it takes is a rake and a hoe
And a piece of fertile ground
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Talking Stores
I heard on the radio that stores will soon begin talking to their customers. No, not store clerks, but the products themselves. A customer walks into a store and the merchandise suggests itself or accessories to go with it. That's just eerie. It reminds me of the scene in Minority Report in which the Tom Cruise character goes into some sort of clothing store (sorry for the vagueness--if it's not a bookstore or a hardware store it doesn't register on my consciousness) and the clothing or mannequins or something greet him by name and suggest some things he might like to buy. If this happened to me I would probably run screaming into the night.
But, really, it's not too different from what Amazon.com does. Have you ever noticed that if you're searching for something on their site (or better yet), buy something, that the page pops up suggestions about similar merchandise that you might want to buy. Now, I don't find that creepy but rather helpful. There's something about a smooth voice emanating from an end cap trying to get me to buy something that raises my hackles.
And, actually, Amazon.com didn't invent the idea. I think it came from a bookstore in Seattle (more precision retail knowledge, I know). The clerks observed where the customers browsed and even if they didn't buy anything, the booksellers would try to engage the customer in conversation about the subjects they seemed interested in. Like Amazon.com, but with people. If the customer brought something to the register, they could suggest similar items. Smart? You bet! Creepy? Not at all--until the clothes in a store start talking to me.
But, really, it's not too different from what Amazon.com does. Have you ever noticed that if you're searching for something on their site (or better yet), buy something, that the page pops up suggestions about similar merchandise that you might want to buy. Now, I don't find that creepy but rather helpful. There's something about a smooth voice emanating from an end cap trying to get me to buy something that raises my hackles.
And, actually, Amazon.com didn't invent the idea. I think it came from a bookstore in Seattle (more precision retail knowledge, I know). The clerks observed where the customers browsed and even if they didn't buy anything, the booksellers would try to engage the customer in conversation about the subjects they seemed interested in. Like Amazon.com, but with people. If the customer brought something to the register, they could suggest similar items. Smart? You bet! Creepy? Not at all--until the clothes in a store start talking to me.
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Easily Amused
One of the great things about
writing this blog is the people who tell me about reading it. Sometimes it reminds them of an experience or
memory they had; sometimes they agree with what I say (and sometimes they
disagree, but as the kids say, it’s all good).
I appreciate everyone who takes the time to read this and to let me know
that they have read it. One lady of my
acquaintance who is both fashionable and intelligent said to me a few weeks
ago, “I really liked what you said in your column this week.”
I quickly began thinking of
all the insightful and resonant ideas and images that were in the piece. However, as sometimes happens, I couldn’t
remember what it was about. “Which one in particular?” I asked her, stalling
for time and insight.
“I liked where you said you
were easily amused,” she answered. “That’s really important.” She went on to
say if more people were easily amused the world would be a better place. I thought hers was a great insight. And it is
so true that I am easily amused.
One interest that I have that
proves I am easily amused is that I like baseball. I know, some people would rather watch paint
dry than sit through a baseball game, but even with the long periods of time in
a game where it seems nothing is happening (or actually nothing is happening),
baseball fascinates me. There is such
subtlety to the game and so many combinations of circumstance. Did you know,
for example, there are eight ways for a batter to reach first base? (Answers at
the end of this piece.)
I am also entertained by
grocery stores. Most people, I would
say, go to grocery stores to buy food and most of them find the trip a
necessity. I could spend all day in a
grocery store. There is such an
abundance and variety. There is produce
no one has ever heard of! There are ten or twelve varieties of potato chips! There are dozens of kinds of cheese! There is so much to look at, I would think
anyone would be amused by it all. We are fortunate to have such choice. Prices,
of course, are another matter that we won’t go into here.
I also find certain programs
on television fascinating. One is Unwrapped on the Food Channel. This program is hosted by Marc Summers who
used to emcee a program called Double
Dare which my children loved. One of the features of Double Dare which kids couldn’t get enough of was the regular
sliming of people on the show. The slime
was a nasty-looking green stuff that poured from the ceiling onto some of the
hapless youngsters at intervals. I was
never sure why. Anyhow, after watching Unwrapped
for a while, it occurred to me that many of the programs are much the same.
They deal with the mass production of a food (cookies, potato chips, taco
shells). The process starts with thousands of pounds of ingredients being
combined in huge mixers. Then the dough or batter or whatever results from the
mixing is dealt out by huge automated machines.
Then it’s baked in an oven hundreds of feet long, packaged, put into
boxes and shipped to consumers. Although
I can predict how the product is going to be made, there’s still plenty to keep
my interest. Who designs these machines?
How long do they last? How can people stand all day culling rejects? What happens
when one of the machines breaks down?
Who fixes them? You can see that
there is much to think about.
I hope you have some things
that amuse and entertain you. There’s something almost everywhere you look, if
you think about it. And oh, the eight ways
to get to first base? 1) hit, 2) walk, 3) hit by pitch, 4) reach on an error,
and 5) reach on a fielder's choice, 6) catcher drops strike three, and the
batter reaches first without being put out; 7) catcher's interference; and 8) a
fielder obstructs the runner on his way down to first base. Now you know!
Monday, August 20, 2012
Memory, Part 2
Don't worry, no singing involved with this post, either.
I need one of these!
I had written about how most of my daily activities center around doing whatever will help me remember what to take where and also when something is going to happen.
There's a sub-category of forgetfulness, and that has to do with packing for a trip. We have been more places this summer than usual and several "incidents" have occurred.
I invariably forget one thing when I travel. Usually it's something easily replaced such as shampoo.
Other times, it's not so easy. Last summer, when we went to state music camp, I forgot to pack a spare pair of reading glasses, which I could have used when one of those tiny little screws fell out of the glasses I had taken. Luckily, Becky had an extra pair and I used those until we could get to Sears Optical and the nice lady replaced the screw. For free. That was nice.
This summer, I forgot the charger for my phone. Walgreens to the rescue!
I also have forgotten to take socks and spent time that trip chasing around Williamsburg looking for a pair. The most important item I had forgotten heretofore was the shirt for my tux. I replaced it in Williamsburg at an exclusive men's shop that charged an exclusive price for a tux shirt. Live and learn, you'd think.
Another time we wanted to go to a funeral connected to a church family while we were in Lynchburg. I had only packed shorts and sandals (and shirts, etc.), but I didn't want to show up at the funeral in shorts. So, we went by the local Belk and I bought some slacks. Which I wore with my sandals. Casual but respectful, I hoped.
This past weekend, though, we drove to a funeral in Durham and guess what I left? My suit. And the shirt. And shoes. And socks and a tie. (I was wearing a belt.) The whole outfit was in a nice garment bag, safely lying on the bed. When I realized it we were three hours down the road and there was no going back. So, we went off to Kohl's in Durham and Becky helped me outfit myself. I rather like the ensemble she came up with.
So, these things happen.I was sharing my genius with some people at the reception and they allowed as how they had forgotten matched shoes for a wedding (not easily duplicated), a tux jacket, and a bridesmaid's dress. In every case there was a workaround. We've participated in those, even one time scaring up a tuxedo for a performer who had forgotten his.
So I guess I don't feel so bad about my packing memory problems. But, in any case, I'm going to start using a checklist. If only I can remember to do so.
I need one of these!
I had written about how most of my daily activities center around doing whatever will help me remember what to take where and also when something is going to happen.
There's a sub-category of forgetfulness, and that has to do with packing for a trip. We have been more places this summer than usual and several "incidents" have occurred.
I invariably forget one thing when I travel. Usually it's something easily replaced such as shampoo.
Other times, it's not so easy. Last summer, when we went to state music camp, I forgot to pack a spare pair of reading glasses, which I could have used when one of those tiny little screws fell out of the glasses I had taken. Luckily, Becky had an extra pair and I used those until we could get to Sears Optical and the nice lady replaced the screw. For free. That was nice.
This summer, I forgot the charger for my phone. Walgreens to the rescue!
I also have forgotten to take socks and spent time that trip chasing around Williamsburg looking for a pair. The most important item I had forgotten heretofore was the shirt for my tux. I replaced it in Williamsburg at an exclusive men's shop that charged an exclusive price for a tux shirt. Live and learn, you'd think.
Another time we wanted to go to a funeral connected to a church family while we were in Lynchburg. I had only packed shorts and sandals (and shirts, etc.), but I didn't want to show up at the funeral in shorts. So, we went by the local Belk and I bought some slacks. Which I wore with my sandals. Casual but respectful, I hoped.
This past weekend, though, we drove to a funeral in Durham and guess what I left? My suit. And the shirt. And shoes. And socks and a tie. (I was wearing a belt.) The whole outfit was in a nice garment bag, safely lying on the bed. When I realized it we were three hours down the road and there was no going back. So, we went off to Kohl's in Durham and Becky helped me outfit myself. I rather like the ensemble she came up with.
So, these things happen.I was sharing my genius with some people at the reception and they allowed as how they had forgotten matched shoes for a wedding (not easily duplicated), a tux jacket, and a bridesmaid's dress. In every case there was a workaround. We've participated in those, even one time scaring up a tuxedo for a performer who had forgotten his.
So I guess I don't feel so bad about my packing memory problems. But, in any case, I'm going to start using a checklist. If only I can remember to do so.
Friday, August 17, 2012
The Continuing No Shame Poetry Series Presents "The Cats Are Driving to Work"
The Cats Are Driving to Work
Clutching their commuter mugs in their right paws
They are listening to traffic and weather on the 8's
The cats are driving to work
Clutching their commuter mugs in their right paws
Holding the steering wheel of their BMW 523 convertibles
In their left
Sipping down strong black coffee, no cream, thanks.
The days of cream are over for cats.
They have the top down although it's 43 degrees
and although they wear fur coats by default
It's cold at 26 miles an hour as they grind through the
Gridlock.
They are listening to traffic and weather on the 8's
From the Catnip-Enclosed Nerve Center
Of WCAT-FM but not really hearing it.
Occasionally, lacking fingers, they lift a paw to
Other drivers in honor of their thoughtful and excellent driving (not).
It means "You're number 1! Keep up the good driving!
Thank you so much!" (Not.) They snarl behind the windshield
Want to kill and eat something rodentesque
But there are only other cats as far as the eye can see.
All the cats are thinking of meeting upon meeting at the
Office, gossip by the water cooler, memos written,
Memos read, memos unread, the chance to be catty
About some loser in the office
(they told me this is what they think about).
(they told me this is what they think about).
In just a few hours they throw it into reverse
And crawl their way home where they will wonder
If the humans asleep in the corner have slept all day
And envy them their simple, easy life.
The cats are driving to work but
They're not liking it,
Not one bit.
--Dan Verner
--Dan Verner
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Advice for Writers--Button, Button, Who's Got the Button
When I was going through my parents' effects late last summer, I came across my mother's "button jar." She, like other women of the time, kept left over or stray or spare buttons of all kinds, generally in a large (empty) (mayonnaise) jar. Whenever a coat or shirt or blouse or pants or whatever needed buttons, she would pour her collection out on the table, select one that most closely matched the original, and sew it on post haste.
I thought this was the normal order of things until we came across any numbers of new buttons in the sewing department of Murphy's one day. "Look at this, Mom! Have you ever seen such a pile of buttons? They're beautiful! Can I get some for my shirts?"
"No."
"Why?"
"Because I'm not paying 59 cents for buttons when I can match them for free from my button jar."
"Oh."
My mother's used button habit was not that unusual, and I have a suspicion she could have bought all the buttons she wanted to. She just didn't want to. And so she continued on happily in the world of buttons, picking up strays when she saw them or taking them off old shirts that soon had a new life as rags. It was recycling before recycling was cool.
We as writers have our own button jars--ideas, expressions, words and phrases that we keep in the mental button jar we carry around. And when it's time, we pull out just the right one and put it to use. And that's a satisfying feeling, like finding just the button that matches the ones already on a garment.
May your mental button jars increase!
Another Time: Velcro: A Promise Unkept, and Yet Another Time: A History of Buttons and Other Fasteners
I thought this was the normal order of things until we came across any numbers of new buttons in the sewing department of Murphy's one day. "Look at this, Mom! Have you ever seen such a pile of buttons? They're beautiful! Can I get some for my shirts?"
"No."
"Why?"
"Because I'm not paying 59 cents for buttons when I can match them for free from my button jar."
"Oh."
My mother's used button habit was not that unusual, and I have a suspicion she could have bought all the buttons she wanted to. She just didn't want to. And so she continued on happily in the world of buttons, picking up strays when she saw them or taking them off old shirts that soon had a new life as rags. It was recycling before recycling was cool.
We as writers have our own button jars--ideas, expressions, words and phrases that we keep in the mental button jar we carry around. And when it's time, we pull out just the right one and put it to use. And that's a satisfying feeling, like finding just the button that matches the ones already on a garment.
May your mental button jars increase!
Another Time: Velcro: A Promise Unkept, and Yet Another Time: A History of Buttons and Other Fasteners
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Pacemakers and Cell Phones
My Dad had a cardiac pacemaker put in about seven years ago now and no one around him knows he has one. It works 24/7/355, giving him very mild electric shocks, and he takes having one as matter of routine. And, as a matter of routine, the battery is going to need replacing soon. We'll schedule the procedure and it will be done in the doctor's office. I think it's pretty good for a battery to last seven years. I have a suspicion it ain't an EverReady.
There has been considerable progress made in the area of pacemakers, I am told. They
are smaller, more powerful and last longer. Their installation procedure has been, realtively speaking, simplified, and the pacers themselves are more reliable.
I was thinking at the same time about some of the improvements made with cell phones recently. While they are smaller, more powerful and easier to operate (maybe), I would venture to say that they have not improved a the same rate as pacemakers. Maybe that is because it is demonstrably more important to keep grandma's heart beating than it is for Muffy to text her girlfriend. Still, yet another errant thought led me to consider whether cell phone technology could be combine with implant improvements.
I think I can sense some resistance to this idea, but please hear me out. The cell phone could be made small enough to put under the skin. It wouldn't have to be replaced (or the battery, anyhow) for seven years. Dialing could be done by speech (already possible) or perhaps soon, thoughts. It wouldn't be much different from Blue Tooth, except the phone couldn't get lost, and neitherr could the earpiece.
I think this will be an option in the next ten years. It's not for everyone, and while I have to frankly admit that having a phone in touch with me 34/7/3565 (under my skin!) gives me pause, it might an idea whose time has come for certain people. Don't sign me up yet, but keep me informed.
There has been considerable progress made in the area of pacemakers, I am told. They
are smaller, more powerful and last longer. Their installation procedure has been, realtively speaking, simplified, and the pacers themselves are more reliable.
I was thinking at the same time about some of the improvements made with cell phones recently. While they are smaller, more powerful and easier to operate (maybe), I would venture to say that they have not improved a the same rate as pacemakers. Maybe that is because it is demonstrably more important to keep grandma's heart beating than it is for Muffy to text her girlfriend. Still, yet another errant thought led me to consider whether cell phone technology could be combine with implant improvements.
I think I can sense some resistance to this idea, but please hear me out. The cell phone could be made small enough to put under the skin. It wouldn't have to be replaced (or the battery, anyhow) for seven years. Dialing could be done by speech (already possible) or perhaps soon, thoughts. It wouldn't be much different from Blue Tooth, except the phone couldn't get lost, and neitherr could the earpiece.
I think this will be an option in the next ten years. It's not for everyone, and while I have to frankly admit that having a phone in touch with me 34/7/3565 (under my skin!) gives me pause, it might an idea whose time has come for certain people. Don't sign me up yet, but keep me informed.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
All Zipped Up
I was zipping up something the other day when the zipper stuck. I would have to say that this rarely happens any more, but since the location of the zipper was such that it had to be zipped up more or less completely for me to be considered part of polite society, I worked with it until it came unstuck and all was right with the world again. I won't mention the location of the aforesaid zipper, but I know that Biscuit City readers (and especially the gentlemen) are familiar with the location of this most important closure.
This quickly resolved bump in the road got me to thinking about zippers in my usual random fashion and I began wondering about the origin and history of zippers. I delved into Wikipedia for some answers and you can do the same (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipper ), but I wanted to pu the description of a zipper here just to show how complicated these things can get:
The bulk of a zipper consists of two strips of fabric tape, each affixed to one of the two pieces to be joined, carrying from tens to hundreds of specially shaped metal or plastic teeth. These teeth can be either individual or shaped from a continuous coil, and are also referred to as elements.[1] The slider, operated by hand, moves along the rows of teeth. Inside the slider is a Y-shaped channel that meshes together or separates the opposing rows of teeth, depending on the direction of the slider's movement. "Zipper" is onomatopoeia, because it was named for the sound it makes when you use it, a high-pitched "zip!"
And just becausd I can't leave well enough alone, I want to note that "onomatapoeia" should be "onomatapoetic" and the use of "you" in the last sentence is weak. I think "named for the sound it makes when used: is better. (Someone stop me! I'm having an editing attack!)
For one, I am glad that good old Gideon Sundback (doesn't his name sound like he could have played for a baseball team of the time? "Batting ninth and pitching, Gideon Sundback!") perfected the zipper around 1917 based on previous less effective fasteners.
I'm sorry to quibble with my good friends from WIkipedia (again!) but the memories I have as a lad of zippers are that they were anything but "perfected." I have been traumatized by a succession of jackets whose zippers stuck part way, leaving the wearer to do the Stuck Zipper Dance and wriggle out of the garment, only to repeat the process in reverse later on. Zippers really didn't improve until they were made of plastic, about the time Velcro came on the scene. I think zippers were intimidated by the unique qualities of Velcro and decided to clean up their act. And so, by and large, it has been jam-free sailing for users of zippers, which is most of us. So, today, if you are wearing a zipper, zip up! (Or zip down! I don't care) and enjoy jam-free(with a few occasional exceptions) openings and closings!
Later on in Biscuit CIty: Button, Button, Who's Got the Button?
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Now It Can Be Told
Pilgrim Monument, in Provincetown, Massachusetts, one of our undisclosed locations this past week. |
Last Thursday we got up about 5 AM to be taken to Dulles Airport by Nephew Josh who did yeoman service driving the mighty Impala and depositing us at the airport at 6:30. We thought there wouldn't be that many people afoot at that early hour but there were teeming hordes of them. We had checked in online so we put our bags in and went through security, arriving at the terminal gate about 8 AM for an 8:30 flight. We grabbed a breakfast sandwich and boarded the flight which was a turboprop.Please remind me to check the flight equipment before I book a flight.
So, we were on our way to Raleigh-Durham Airport or more specifically to Durham to visit our friends Ed and Marji Bratcher. Ed was pastor of our church for fifteen years, and we have kept in touch with them. If you know them, they are both doing well. The assisted living facility they live in is amazing, and the food is wonderful. If I lived there I would weigh about 400 pounds.
Item two on the agenda was a choral music reading conference sponsored by Hinshaw Music. If you've never been to a choral music reading conference, don't go. (Little joke, there, Becky!) No, in this activity each participant is given a packet or several packets of music (all published by the company putting on the reading, strangely enough) and then everyone reads through the anthems. There were about 300 people there, including a lot of choral directors, so the group sounded good even though we were sight-singing.
A rather distant shot of John Rutter, directing. The man is a genius. |
After the day's events, we went back and had dinner with the Bratchers and headed out for an evening concert of the choral music we had gone over, done by some fine singers who had actually rehearsed it. John Rutter conducted several of his pieces for the second half, and they were glorious.
We left the assisted living facility the next morning about 4 AM to make a 6:05 flight to Providence, RI to be picked up by our long-time friend Jerry Cerasale. The flight, which used a jet, stopped at Dulles so we could say hello to Northern Virginia. We walked up to the connecting flight's gate and walked right on the aircraft. Jerry picked us up at 9:30 and we were on our way to the house on Cape Cod (Eastham) the Cerasales own and will eventually retire to. They are models of hospitality. Jan puts together gourmet meals and we had many good and deep conversations. Cape Cod has historic and natural wonders, and we sampled both. And oh, yes, the shopping, as Becky will tell you, is marvelous.
So, Jan drove us back to the Providence Airport Thursday afternoon and we got into Dulles about 4:15. It was a busy time away; it was good to get away, but it's always good to come home. Amy and Alyssa came Friday, keeping up the more or less steady presence of Verners at the Cerasales.
I hope you have as restful a vacation as we did.
Monday, August 6, 2012
We're on Vacation!
That's spelled V-A-C-A-T-I-O-N, and that's where we'll be, so we're shutting down the glass-enclosed observation post here at Biscuit City Enterprises and are scattering to the four corners of the country.
DV is going to have a staycation and work on catching up on old issues of National Geographic the way his hero Andy Griffith used to do on his vacation.
Chief of Staff Molly Bolt is leaving for an undisclosed location. Word is she needs a break from her sister Dolly Grip, Holly Berry, and Jolly St. Nicholas since they have been staying with her for the past month. Molly seems exhausted and we hope she can rest and recharge this week.
Harrison Bergeron has a pile of books to review so he too is sequestering himself as well. There is probably no truth to the rumor that he and Molly are off together. It's just a friendship, folks.
Nancy Whiskey will go back to Florida to compete in the Amateur Beach Volleyball Nationals following her release from her suspension for hitting too hard in the games this spring. Harrison Schmidt will be going to keep score for the girls. He says he likes their uniforms.
B. Russell Sprout will visit Belgium to see some family, mostly cousins. We hope he brings back chocolate.
CEO NK will work on undisclosed projects designed to bring Biscuit City Enterprises continuing honor and glory. She's a worker, our Nancy!
Enjoy your week off folks! We'll enjoy ours!
DV is going to have a staycation and work on catching up on old issues of National Geographic the way his hero Andy Griffith used to do on his vacation.
Chief of Staff Molly Bolt is leaving for an undisclosed location. Word is she needs a break from her sister Dolly Grip, Holly Berry, and Jolly St. Nicholas since they have been staying with her for the past month. Molly seems exhausted and we hope she can rest and recharge this week.
Harrison Bergeron has a pile of books to review so he too is sequestering himself as well. There is probably no truth to the rumor that he and Molly are off together. It's just a friendship, folks.
Nancy Whiskey will go back to Florida to compete in the Amateur Beach Volleyball Nationals following her release from her suspension for hitting too hard in the games this spring. Harrison Schmidt will be going to keep score for the girls. He says he likes their uniforms.
B. Russell Sprout will visit Belgium to see some family, mostly cousins. We hope he brings back chocolate.
CEO NK will work on undisclosed projects designed to bring Biscuit City Enterprises continuing honor and glory. She's a worker, our Nancy!
Enjoy your week off folks! We'll enjoy ours!
Friday, August 3, 2012
The Continuing No Shame Poetry Series Presents "Demeter in the Supermarket"
Demeter in the Supermarket
She stalks across the parking lot
And maybe it’s a trick of light
In the heat distorted air
But it looks like she is walking above the surface.
At the cart line, she jerks one loose:
It has one stuck wheel
And another that just spins stupidly
But the rest are no better.
She begins her tour of the aisles,
A goddess among mortals
Going counterclockwise
Against traffic
Someone runs a cart up on her
Achilles tendon.
It’s enough to make a
Goddess curse.
Silencing a child’s tantrum in the cereal aisle
With one frosted look
She peruses the grains before
Settling on some nice quinoa,
Shudders through the frozen foods
(She doesn’t like the cold)
Moves inexorably toward
The produce section
And there she stays
Looking at the pomegranates
Trying to remember.
--Dan Verner
She stalks across the parking lot
And maybe it’s a trick of light
In the heat distorted air
But it looks like she is walking above the surface.
At the cart line, she jerks one loose:
It has one stuck wheel
And another that just spins stupidly
But the rest are no better.
She begins her tour of the aisles,
A goddess among mortals
Going counterclockwise
Against traffic
Someone runs a cart up on her
Achilles tendon.
It’s enough to make a
Goddess curse.
Silencing a child’s tantrum in the cereal aisle
With one frosted look
She peruses the grains before
Settling on some nice quinoa,
Shudders through the frozen foods
(She doesn’t like the cold)
Moves inexorably toward
The produce section
And there she stays
Looking at the pomegranates
Trying to remember.
--Dan Verner
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Advice for Writers--Tape and Rule
My father was a heck of a carpenter until tremors in his hands made it difficult for him to build as he used to. I helped him on a number of jobs and learned a lot about the trade, although I will never be a furniture-grade artisan. I'm more a treehouse/doghouse level practitioner of the art. My tightest tolerance is 1/2 an inch, in a field where tolerances are zero inches. You get the idea.
Nonetheless, I enjoy building things and doing projects using my skills, such as they are. Recently (since last August) I have been converting our security fence that used to be around our swimming pool (which was filled in several years ago) into a nice picket fence. My dad sometimes comes to watch and advise me. Now, I prefer to use a tape to measure things. He swears by a rule, which I am not comfortable using. I've tried using one, and folding and unfolding one seems to be too much work. A rule does have the advantage of not flexing back on itself and collapsing like a tape, but, hey, I can work with a few collapsed tapes.
Here are a couple of shots of my fence project, which is about 40% complete:
Here's a nice picture of a Stanley tape, just like the one I have:
Nonetheless, I enjoy building things and doing projects using my skills, such as they are. Recently (since last August) I have been converting our security fence that used to be around our swimming pool (which was filled in several years ago) into a nice picket fence. My dad sometimes comes to watch and advise me. Now, I prefer to use a tape to measure things. He swears by a rule, which I am not comfortable using. I've tried using one, and folding and unfolding one seems to be too much work. A rule does have the advantage of not flexing back on itself and collapsing like a tape, but, hey, I can work with a few collapsed tapes.
Here are a couple of shots of my fence project, which is about 40% complete:
Another shot of the fence, showing a part near the house. You can see the old security fence in the background, and the new picket fence to the left. Progress is being made. |
And here's a picture of a rule:
The point is this: using a rule or a tape is a matter of comfort and personal preference. Either one will get the job done. So it is with writing. There's no wrong or write way to go about it. Some writers write in the morning, some in the afternoon. Some write in marathon sessions, others for short bursts. These things don't matter: what matters is that the job of producing meaningful, truth-filled and excellent writing is done. Rule or tape: it's your choice. Write on!
Society and Technology--E-Mail, Telegraphs, Pneumatic Tubes and Frequent Snail Mail
Like many
other people, I am a part of an email group and receive regular messages.
Because I am about as sharp as, say, an eight-year-old on the computer, I’m
careful to reply only to the sender.
Some people reply to the group inadvertently, which makes for good times. Receiving
messages intended for someone else really seems to bother some people on email;
perhaps I am a trifle voyeuristic, but I enjoy reading other people’s
email. It gets really fun when people
don’t recognize the sender and then send more messages to the entire group,
frequently creating a cascading effect that can lock up a system for days. My school system email with thousands of
users went down for the better part of a day as a result of one unknown email
sent to everyone. I’ve heard other people say the same thing. The solution, of
course, is not to reply to the email, or, if you’re bothered by it that much,
delete it before you read it. I also know people who are inordinately bothered by
spam, the junk mail of the internet.
That’s also a case of deleting, although I think I don’t receive as much
spam as some people do.
E-mail is
fairly handy since it’s fast and easy to use. You can also send messages to
groups of people (see above--and I know--I am a technological genius with such observations). I remember
when the preferred method of notification of numbers of people was the telephone tree. Not a pretty sight,
and not that reliable.
The internet
has certainly changed our lives. In the bad old days research was done by going
to the library, poring through books and magazines and taking notes on the
information on aptly named note cards. When I had a serious term paper to do, I
had a note card box I carried around with the information on cards in it. It
was probably an incredibly geeky thing to do, even then, but it kept me from
losing the cards. When it was time to
write the paper, I laid the cards out on the floor of the basement and had a
huge living outline. One time my mom
opened the door to the outside and the wind blew my outline away. It seemed somehow like a parable.
I’ve just
finished reading a book by Tom Standage called The Victorian Internet. He argues that the telegraph in the
nineteenth century functioned much like the internet does in our day. (In
another book, he says that coffee houses in seventeenth century England
functioned like the internet. The man is
crazy for seeing the internet behind every bush.) I’m not totally convinced since the telegraph
required trained operators at both ends to send and receive messages, but he
does have a lot of cool information about the telegraph system. For one thing,
operators could recognize each other by the way they manipulated the key. The
telegraph network consisted of branch lines which fed into an office, which retransmitted
the message on another branch line to its final destination. In some cases, there were several central
offices in a city, and the messages had
to be delivered to another office, using messengers. This wasn’t the speediest method in the
world, so telegraph companies built pneumatic tubes to transfer messages
between offices. (You can see pneumatic systems at work in bank drive-ins. Department stores used to have them when they
had a central cashier, usually located on a balcony high above the sales
floor. It was real entertainment to try
to follow the capsule as it sped on its way.)
These tubes seemed like a good idea, and by the end of nineteenth century, major cities had pneumatic mail systems used well into the twentieth century. Some inventors even tried a pneumatic subway system to move people in New York. It ran a few blocks and wasn’t successful. I would think a vacuum strong enough to move a carload of people would produce an unpleasant effect on the ears.
These tubes seemed like a good idea, and by the end of nineteenth century, major cities had pneumatic mail systems used well into the twentieth century. Some inventors even tried a pneumatic subway system to move people in New York. It ran a few blocks and wasn’t successful. I would think a vacuum strong enough to move a carload of people would produce an unpleasant effect on the ears.
The internet
is responsible for the decline in the number of regular (“snail”) mail items
sent. Still, until we have transporters a la Star Trek, we’ll need to rely on delivery
services to transport the goods we order online. It seemed that I remember the
mail being delivered twice a day and found out that indeed it was, until about
1950. Catalogues and ads could arrive more often.
There’s a
delightful book by Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows called The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie
Society which is developed entirely through letters between the
characters. It’s hard to tell exactly
from the book, but it seems that in London after World War II at least the mail
came several times a day. It was
entirely possible to invite someone to dinner in the evening by sending a
letter than morning and receiving a reply the same day. In late eighteenth
century London, mail was delivered six times
a day. Now that’s approaching
internet status.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)